What Is Jiu-Jitsu,
By Roberto Pedreira
Posted November 3, 2016
There was a brief but frantic "craze" for jiu-jitsu in
America and a few European countries during the Russo-Japanese
War (1904-1905), stimulated in part by the fact that the most prominent
person on the planet, American president Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909) happened to have an obsession
with the "Japanese game" as he called it. Contrary to myth, his interest was
superficial and short-lived (he took five or fewer weeks of lessons in
1902 and seven or fewer weeks in 1904). The jiu-jitsu fad was also promoted by Japanese propagandists who
coordinated with American and English journalists and other
opinion-molders to foster a
positive impression of Japan in general. The fad faded away by the end of 1905
for several reasons, one being that fads are always temporary, another
being that American wrestlers consistently beat alleged jiu-jitsu masters
and champions in contests. Jiu-jitsu survived, as
a form of entertainment in circuses, on
vaudeville stages, and in professional wrestling shows, as a genre of
self-defense, and surprisingly, as a scientific educational system created
by Jigoro Kano,
who originally considered
Kodokan Judo as an eclectic style of jiu-jitsu (at least that is how he described
it to foreigners, as we will see below, or more exactly, as
"jiujutsu"). As we know, jiu-jitsu came to the West by way of Japan. But if we ask
Japanese people what jiu-jitsu is, they will scratch their heads. Never
heard of it, they'll say (あまり聞たことないと思う）.The reason is that jiu-jitsu is not a word in Japan, or rather it
is not a word for a martial art (or budo system). In fact, even if
you pronounce the word correctly, as jūjutsu (柔術),
ordinary Japanese are
unlikely to have any clue. If you explain, "you know, Gracie?"
then they will (usually) get it. But they will think it means
総合格闘技 (MMA).Brazilians knew
(i.e., had read) about "jiu-jitsu" even before the first
Japanese jiu-jitsu man and jiu-jitsu woman arrived in 1908 and began
performing on stages in Rio in 1909, emulating the shows of Yukio Tani,
Taro Miyake, Akitaro Ono, and Sadakazu 'Raku' Uyenishi in Europe, who were
well-known to wrestling fans in São Paulo and Rio (see Choque vol. 1 for
details). The jiu-jitsu fad arrived later, and faded later, in Brazil than
elsewhere and quickly became a form of pro wrestling in the 1930's (to be
more precise, some jiu-jitsu stylists became pro wrestlers and some pro
wrestlers participated in 'jiu-jitsu rules' matches, but in general, fans
did not want to watch jiu-jitsu matches). Jiu-jitsu in Brazil eventually
shriveled up into an obscure fringe sport practiced by a single family and
their friends, until Rorion Gracie moved to Los Angeles and translated it into terms Americans could understand, street
punch-outs and (with Art Davie) spectator ring sports. (Most former
jiu-jitsu men became judokas and people who in earlier times might have
trained jiu-jitsu gravitated to judo instead). The Japanese
recognize economic opportunity when they see it and quickly jumped on
board (pro wrestling was already huge and MMA was just a slightly novel
form of pro wrestling, as they saw it).
They didn't think it was Japanese jujutsu coming back home. They saw it as
a distinctly Brazilian product. And an eminently marketable one. (See interview with Morishita Naoto for
perspective.)The Brazilians (the Gracies at least) however, insist on tracing their style back to Japan,
but to pre-Kano times. Judo, in their theory, was and is fake jiu-jitsu.
The emperor of Japan told a civil servant named Kano to create a phony
system of fighting to teach to foreigners so that they wouldn't learn the
secrets of real fighting. That is the Gracie theory. So what is jiu-jitsu really?Jiu-jitsu is one of the spellings of the word jūjutsu [柔術] that
were current by the beginning of the 20th century. Foreigners found
the word, and Japanese in general, baffling. Dictionaries were sold
promising to teach buyers how to pronounce even such exotic words as
'jiu-jitsu'. Other spellings were also used, almost randomly, but in
time 'jiu-jitsu' became the standard.Assuming that jiu-jitsu and
jiujutsu are one and the same, as the
Brazilians insisted, what then is (or was) jiujutsu (hereafter spelled
jiu-jitsu for the sake of simplicity)?We have an excellent source, namely none other than Jigoro Kano. On
April 18, 1888, Kano gave a lecture in Tokyo, in English, titled
"Jiujutsu: The Old Samurai Art of Fighting without Weapons"
(translated by Reverend Thomas Lindsay). It was published in 1889 in Transactions
of the Asiatic Society of Japan. Essentially, everyone read it,
and most writers cited it, some cribbed liberally from it, a few ignored
it (because didn't meet their marketing objectives). A few examples:
Lafcadio Hearn mentioned it in Out of the East (a popular 1895 book);
Inazo Nitobe certainly read it but if (implausibly) not, he definitely
read Hearn. Nitobe's 1900 book, Bushido: The Soul of Japan was even more
influential, with numerous reprintings and translations in European and
other languages. F. J. Norman, and E. J. Harrison who both wrote widely-read
books, borrowed from it. So did 10-dan Kyuzo Mifune in his Canon
of Judo. More recent books include Yokoyama Kendō's 1991日本武道史, among
numerous others in Japan.Unfortunately, most writers,
H. Irving Hancock being the most prolific offender among them, simply "made [up their own] history to suit their own purposes"
(as Kano said). Rorion Gracie was merely the most recent in a long line of
marketers who made history to suit their own purposes.
As a historical
note, the Gracie version of jiu-jitsu history derives in at least part
from Hancock, as demonstrated in Choque Vol. 1.
The article (first page) that started it all:
"Jiujutsu: The Old Samurai Art of Fighting without
Weapons" (lecture given April 18, 1888, published 1889).
Kano was well qualified to write on the topic because he was around at
a time when there were over 80 schools of jiujutsu in Tokyo alone. Kano
studied two styles in depth, Tenjinshinyō-ryū [天神真楊流]
Kitō-ryū [起倒流] and researched others. The Tenjinshinyō and Kitō
styles are the technical foundations of Kano's original 1882 Kodokan Judo.
In short, Kano knew what he was talking aboutAs explained by Kano, jiu-jutsu was one of several names for the art of
"fighting without weapons" or in some cases, with short weapons
against long weapons (pp. 192-193). Other names for jiujutsu were Yawara,
Taijutsu, Kogusoku, Kempo, and Hakuda. Jiudō was also used (Kano
did not claim to invent the word; he chose it primarily because jiujutsu
had acquired a negative connotation and had always been the least
prestigious of the martial arts).As mentioned above, Kano remarked that "The originators of new
schools [new styles or ryū] seem oftentimes to have made history to
suit their own purposes." He also noted that "Printed books on
the subject are scarce...[many] manuscripts belonging to various schools
of the art...are contradictory and unsatisfactory" (p. 193). He was
alerting the listener-reader that the sources he was about to cite were
not necessarily reliable. Take it for what it's worth, he was saying．Good
advice, then and now.He first described the history of jiujutsu, or rather
the history according to various sources, none of which could be taken as
definitive. The stories are probably familiar to most readers today.
Virtually every account of jiujutsu history written in English since 1889
essentially derives from the same sources, via Kano's article.Kano then introduced several of the main jiujutsu
styles, of which he says there are "hundreds, because almost all the
teachers who have attained some eminence in the art have originated their
own schools" (p. 198). The schools Kano selected to mention were those that
best exemplified the principles of jiujutsu, and also had many students.
These styles were Kitō ryū, Kiushin ryū, Sekiguchi ryū, Yoshin ryū, and
Tenjinshinyō ryū. Tenjinshinyō and Kitō ryū, as we have noted,
contributed most of the technical resources of early Kodokan judo.
Representatives of Kiushin ryū and
Sekiguchi ryū, among other ryū, joined the Kodokan in due course. In the
process, and over time, Kodokan judo adopted techniques from these styles,
and the styles adopted techniques from other styles, via the Kodokan
curriculum and through contact with individual instructors, some of whom
taught at the Butokukai training facilities in Kyoto after 1895. That was an
inevitable result of contact but it was also Kano's explicit policy to
scientifically improve judo through research and practice.He then described the various ways of gaining victory
"by pliancy" such as throwing, choking, holding, twisting and bending arms
and legs. Some schools also specialized in atemi (striking and
kicking) and kuatsu (resuscitation). Then he recounted several stories about
famous/legendary teachers. These stories were recycled in articles by
Shidachi, Burgin, and E. J. Harrison, among many others. The conclusion describes Kano's judo as
style of jiujutsu, but unlike the old forms of jiujutsu from the feudal
period, which were "mainly used for fighting purposes" Kano's
jiujutsu system, which he named judo, was a "system of athletics and
mental and moral training". Here we can see where Mr. Helio Gracie
and his sons got their ideas. The problem is that what the Gracies were
doing was not old feudal jiujutsu, but rather Kano judo without the mental
and moral training, and as some have commented, without good throws. Kano did not endorse either professional wrestling or
street fighting, needless to say, but he was sympathetic to judoka who needed
to make a living, and he always intended that judo have applicability for
Kano as a young jiujutsu student.
It is ironic that while the Gracies did actually
succeed, for a while, in preserving the older form of Kodokan judo
(despite calling it jiu-jitsu and minus the throws) the IBJJF is following
the example of the International Judo Federation in (trying) to make
judo/jiu-jitsu a TV and spectator-friendly sport, essentially destroying
it in the process. (See Negative
Judo for perspective).Executive
Summary: The word 'jiu-jitsu' was originally, from approximately 1900, used by different people to
mean different things, including but not limited to Kodokan judo and
slightly variant forms of judo as practiced by the Kyoto based Butokukai
(est. 1895). According to the best informed authority on the subject in
1889, jiu-jitsu (more correctly written as 'jiujutsu') referred to
techniques for fighting without weapons, or with short weapons against
long weapons. The specific techniques varied, and depended on the
particular ryū (style, school, tradition). Jiu-jitsu (under any
spelling) never meant a style or art. It was simply a
cover term for techniques not already classified as "major" and
more militarily relevant than individual unarmed or small weapons
fighting. What the Gracie family
described as jiu-jitsu (and still do) is judo. However, exactly like judo,
jiu-jitsu was and still is eclectic and dynamic, changing over time in
ways that are both better and worse, depending on one's preferences. And like judo,
(the Brazilian form of it), is in peril of being destroyed by those who
want to exploit it economically.
Books and articles mentioned above include:
George Brown. (1892). Japanese Fighting: Self-Defence by Sleight of Body.
The Idler, 2 (London:
October, 1892), 281-286. Reprinted in Journal of Combative Sport, December
Lafcadio. (1895). "Jiujutsu" in Out of the East. MA:
& Kano Jigoro. (1889). The Old Samurai Art of Fighting without
of the Asiatic Society of
Kyuzo. (1960/2004). The Canon of
Judo (translated by Françoise White).
Nitobe Inazo, (1900).
Bushido: The Soul of Japan.
[Also published in the United States by Leeds & Biddle, of
Norman, F. J. (1905). The Fighting Man
Archebald Constable & Co. Ltd.
Tetsujiro. (1892). “Jujitsu”, The Ancient Art of Self-Defence by
Sleight of Body. Proceedings of the
[Yokoyama, Kendō]. (1991). 日本武道史.
Readers who are interested in the
verified history of jiu-jitsu beginning with Jigoro Kano will want to
consult Craze 1: The Life and Times of Jiu-Jitsu,
1. Properly written and romanized, Jigoro Kano would be
(family name first).
In Japanese, 嘉納治五郎.
the sake of simplicity, we will use the conventional spelling (which is
also used by Kodokan).
2. Assuming you pronounced the first syllable correctly (long) it would be
充実, which means "fullness", "replenishment",
"substantiality", "repletion" (i.e., nothing to do
with martial arts). The first syllable
in jiu-jutsu is long; the letter 'i' was used to suggest length; likewise
the letter 'y'. More
typically a long 'u' is written with a macron [ū] or circumflex [û].
3. By Brazilians we mean primarily Carlos Gracie, Helio Gracie, Carlson
Gracie, Reylson Gracie, and Rorion Gracie, as discussed in Choque Vols.
some expert evaluations about the Gracie's (especially Helio's) throwing
skills see Masahiko Kimura in Choque 2, chp. 2, and George Mehdi in
Jiu-Jitsu in the South Zone, chp. 14, and chps. 12-16 in Choque
Now out-of-print, Serge Mol's
Classical Fighting Arts of
International, is worth consulting.
Gracie Theory of Jiu-Jitsu History
Here is an alternative theory, written by a friend of
the Gracie family named Helcio Leal Binda and revised
by Reyson Gracie. Note that neither Helcio Leal Binda nor Reyson are (or
were) historians, and both were writing to promote Gracie academies: Origins of Jiu-Jitsu
(c) 2016, Roberto Pedreira. All rights reserved.
Slightly revised November 5, 2016.